I would expect the software to take advantage of the GPUs on the Mac Pro which would make it faster, but I would expect the speed differences between the two versions to be similar. I no longer have access to a new Mac Pro, so I can’t test AME on that system. In the case of XDCAM, AME is more than three times slower.Ĭlick here to download a 2-page PDF with more detailed test results. (Duration is expressed as Hours:Minutes:Seconds.)Īs you can see in the chart, the speed improvements in the 2015 version are slight and, in the case of 2-pass compression, the new version is slower than the older version.Īt no time does the latest version of AME exceed the speed of the latest version of Apple Compressor. What I did, to compare results, was total the amount of time it took to compress all four files, using both 1-pass (fastest) and 2-pass (theoretically the highest quality) compression. (Click the image to download a 2-page PDF providing more detailed test results.) All source media and resulting compressed files were stored locally. No other changes were made to the compression setting for this test. ![]() To allow me to compare results between software, I changed the default bit rate from 16 mbps to 10 mbps, which matched the default bit rate for Apple Compressor. These are the same test files I used in all previous compression speed tests, so you can compare results between tests.ĭuring compression all files were scaled to 1280 x 720, using the YouTube 720 preset shipped with Adobe Media Encoder. 21″ iMac, late 2013, 16 GB of RAM, 3.1 GHz i7 processorįor this test, I created a series of four test files, all exported as Master files from Final Cut Pro X.This test was only run on a current-model 21″ iMac: In all cases, Apple Compressor was faster than Adobe Media Encoder in some cases compressing more than three times faster. With some codecs, the 2015 version was slower than the 2014 version. The greatest performance improvement was only 7.4% when compressing in 1-pass mode. The new 2015 version of Adobe Media Encoder is only marginally faster than the 2014 version. This article compares whether enabling multiple instances in Compressor speeds up compression on either a MacPro or an iMac.This article compares the speed of Adobe Media Encoder CC 2015 to Adobe Media Encoder cc 2014.This article compares the speed of Adobe Media Encoder CC 2014 to Apple Compressor 4.2. ![]() ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |